New England Man said he is not opposed to the proposal in principle, but raised a number of questions he felt had not yet been adequately addressed. He emphasized that he supports progress and understands the need for change, while noting that timing, scale, and long-term impacts remain unclear. He encouraged officials to slow the process and consider whether this particular approach truly reflects the character of the community.
New England Man said he understands the need for traffic cones and agrees they may be necessary for safety. He added, however, that their appearance is out of character with the surrounding area and questioned whether a less visually intrusive option had been considered. While he emphasized that safety comes
New England Man said that although progress can be slow, taking the time to reach the right outcome is worthwhile. He cautioned against viewing delays as obstacles rather than opportunities to improve the final result. He added that decisions of lasting significance deserve careful attention.
New England Man said he was uncertain how decisions related to the proposal were being documented and followed over time. He asked whether commitments made during earlier discussions had been formally recorded and revisited. He noted that continuity can be difficult to maintain when conversations stretch across months or years.
New England Man said that while each individual change may seem modest, their cumulative impact deserves consideration. He questioned whether enough attention has been paid to how incremental decisions shape the town over time. He suggested that looking at the bigger picture could help avoid unintended consequences.